The Nature of Qualitative Studies

Merriam was required to travel across the world to Malaysia to learn her make on how assimilation influences older adults and identifies the level of learning that transpire. The cost involved in Americas (2000) case was similarly to a greater extent expensive than the in setion conducted by Distilled (2000), in addition, the sample size used in Americas (2000) instruction was more diversified. Diesels (2000) stem is much narrower and more conceded than Americas (2000) paper. Distilled (2000) exceptional her correction to females only, contrary to How Cultural value Shape Learning in sure-enough(a) Adulthood The Case of Malaysia (2000) where some(prenominal) males and females were used.Divergences. The divergences Americas (2000) credentials ar included in her paper whereas, Distilled (2000) has no mention of her level of dwell or raising that supports her ability to conduct a valid field of operation on her chosen topic. Professional literary works canvass J oined with personal humps of the searcher is essential for intricacy of the entropy. (Glasses, 1978). Although, Distilled (2000) did make mention that her question topic was selected because of the recommendations of former look forers. This statement altogether gives merit to the contri aloneion, need, and worth of research on her topic. Main Points.The main points of consensus in two cover is that spiritual well-being was extremely important to twain exact groups. Distilled (2000) indicated that her bailiwick groups spiritual development was non unbroken and varied from time to time. This is understandable since our environmental changes can persuade what is important and what is not as we go through spirit. Methodology. whatever dependable research undertaking starts with a topic, paradox, and atomic number 18a of interest, as well as a paradigm. Crewel, 1998) Keeping this in mind, Merriam (2000) and Distilled (2000) both(prenominal) conducted their studies by using the qualitative methodology.Perhaps since both studies were based on social issues with populace from elder groups the qualitative methodology is the outstrip for conducting interviews and surveys. Qualitative research is a make approach that is many times order by the human belief system. (Merriam, 2002) Merriam (2000) introduced comparisons surrounded by older adults in the westbound to the easterly parts of the world. The values from the West and the easternmost were comp ard also with he Asian culture having a greater regard on being in harmony with character, relationships and cooperation as one grows older, somewhat incompatible than that of Western counterparts.The Western senior citizen enjoys compe detractorion and independence as they maturate. Findings from opposite studies show Westerners are more prone to sickness and dormant behaviors if they loose their independence. It is natural for an American to figure out in his/her senior years. Merriam (2000 ) says whether the older adults were from the due east or the West, they were both concerned with their health and living conditions as they grow older. Also, the elders in the East take pride in being wiser with age. Some Simians moot in re-incarnation of the soul, where Americans believe in autonomy in human life.The setting of Americas (2000) study was in easterly Malaysia where it was found to have a precise diverse culture with Chinese, Indians and Malaysian. The distinct cultures in Asia do not both have the same ghostlike beliefs, but all appear to value spirituality, harmony, and family. Distilled (2000) conducted her study also using the qualitative research method. She used a 4. 5 3 instant taped interview to pucker data. The taped interviews were later put down for revue and analysis. Diesels (2000) study population consist of 46 participants from non-homogeneous pagan backgrounds.Diesels research study appeared to be theoretical with an intent to narrow ho w the participants spirituality affected their chosen public lifes in development, in addition to, how they viewed knowledge and education. The fomite which Distilled (2000) used for data analysis was the continuous comparative method. (Merriam, 5998). Irishman (5993) tells us that Interviews are transcribed to best represent the dynamic nature of the living conversation. Purpose and Goals. The social occasion of Americas (2000) study was to become more knowledgeable most the nature of how older adults in Eastern Asia gain knowledge.Merriam (2000) attempted to prove that ethnical values are emotion-laden, internalized assumptions, beliefs, or standards that storehouse how we interpret our life experiences. The purpose of Diesels (2000) study was to look into the spiritual development of various cultural groups of women who choose adult education for social change and, how the association of their career fields direct them toward emancipators adult education practices. Data Collection. Americas (2000) study was conducted using descriptive and inductive qualitative research that tell on revealing the significance of participants of the study.The chosen sample population in Americas (2000) study was 59 participants all over the age of 60 years old. Americas data was amass by one-on-one open-ended interviews in natural settings that lasted about one hour long in two different languages. Merriam (2000) presented a demographic profile of her participants that was very helpful in seeing the boilers suit picture in regard to ethnic group, age, sex, work experience and education. On the other hand, Distilled (2000) did not include visuals in her research paper. Data analysis from Americas (2000) study was entire in accordance with the constant comparative method (Merriam, 6998).Americas (2000) three themes in findings were presented clearly, concisely, and to the point. each(prenominal) theme addressed the nature of learning for older Mainstay adults. (M erriam, 2000) Diesels (2000) study was conducted tit taped interviews of participants that were later transcribed for canvass and analysis. The analysis of the Spiritual Development and Commitments to Emancipators gentility n Women Adult Educators for Social qualify study was presented in a memoir discussion forum with discussions describing each participants experience and character.Reported Findings. Merriam (2000) presented her findings in a narrative format under three different themes, I. E. escaped and embedded in the concerns and activities of everyday life, learning is communal, and learning is dictated by spiritual and/or religious concerns. Each theme was presented in spot to ensure the outcome of Americas (2000) study was mum by any reader. Diesels (2000) paper was also presented in a narrative format. I believe Diesels (2000) overall study including her ending is very abrupt and diminutive.Diesels (2000) findings conclude that on that point is a unwashed thr ead amid spiritual development, and Emancipators adult education efforts. Structure. The commonality structure shared by both papers is qualitative research narrative formatted with common titles. Each paper presented an introduction, purpose, literature review, discussion, findings, methodology, resulting themes, conclusions and references. Conclusion. With any erect qualitative study, maturation a problem statement, a purpose statement questions is important.Both of the studies cited in this paper are good examples of qualitative research papers in may ways, penthouse, the research questions are not presented. Both studies present an characteristics of a qualitative study. Bogged & Bikini (1992) says participant posting and in-depth interviewing are the most common data collection techniques. However, the problem statements from both studies are extremely vague. According to Christensen, et al. (2011) the characteristics of a good problem statement are Where applicable the variables in a research problem should express a relationship.The statement of the pirate states the rationale for the study. The statement of the problem should be testable. A problem statement should tie a reader from a common perspective to a believed problem followed by a solution. In addition, I believe the study group selected by Distilled may be scrutinized because 86 is not good representation of all Women Adult Educators. In closing with a positive note, both Distilled (2000) and Merriam (2000) gave credit where credit was due by appropriately citing references, since any researcher knows buccaneering is unforgivable in the academic world.