Thursday, April 2, 2020
The Human Origins Of War Essay Research free essay sample
The Human Origins Of War Essay, Research Paper Human nature, and the extent to which it straight effects our behavior, is a beginning of intense contention. This is reflected in the argument sing the aggressive nature of worlds and the grade to which they are inherently aggressive. However, surveies indicate that worlds are inherently aggressive and that our behavior is defined by familial belongingss, and influenced by cultural and environmental factors. However, this does non propose that aggression is our specifying characteristic, or that it can non be controlled by society. Our reaction to, and abetment of, war illustrates this. It is widely recognised that it is this built-in nature that has lead to war on major and minor graduated tables, but it is non an inevitable consequence of human nature. Many taking intellectuals utilise the inactive nature of adult females as a contentious statement to our aggressive nature. However, this is a limited statement that can be consistently disproven once we recognise the societal restr ictions that are used to control the female aggressive nature. We will write a custom essay sample on The Human Origins Of War Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Aggressiveness is recognised by several outstanding intellectuals. William James states that, combat and war seeded to fulfill deep-seated demands of persons and societies, demands that were presumed to be built-in in all worlds, proposing that our aggressiveness has inevitable decisions. Freud besides supported this statement and maintained that human open aggression is a consequence of internal aggressive thrusts being redirected at others: adult male needs to fulfill his demands. Thomas Hobbes expands on this by saying that worlds are self-serving, greedy and selfish in respects to fulfilling their demands. These perceptual experiences of human nature indicate a instead black position of human aggression, nevertheless by researching why this aggression occurs we understand that in itself it is non a strictly destructive facet of our nature. The controversial statement sing the nature versus raising argument contributes to our apprehension of aggression. Those intellectuals who su pport the nature construct of aggression discuss both ethology and sociobiology. Simplistically, ethology provinces that adult male is the merchandise of two million old ages of biological development, while sociobiology argues that although biological development has considerable influence, the importance must be placed on the interaction of cistrons with their cultural environment. Conversely, the raising argument argues that aggression is strictly determined by cultural influences and that biological considerations are non of import. Unlike the raising argument or ethology, sociobiology represents right the belief that aggression is an built-in facet of our nature, but that it can be induced or controlled by our cultural and societal environment. The theories of sociobiologists are supported by our look of aggression in the pastoral phase of our development. Initially worlds appeared to be a comparatively peaceable society, nevertheless our patterned advances from the hunter-gath erer to the pastoral phase lead to an addition in aggression, providing a trigger for our built-in aggression. As Richard Leaky wrote: every bit shortly as people commit themselves to agricultural nutrient production they commit themselves to supporting the land they farm. To run off is to confront certain loss. This demonstrates how our environment cultivates our built-in aggression, and illustrates that worlds will act in an aggressive mode when provoked. This may look disheartening, because it seems to province that human aggression is inevitable. However, this aggression can be channeled into other patterns that have less negative results than force and war. Sport is a good illustration of imparting aggression. Society often encourages its public to bask, and take part in, activities where adult male can confront an opposition and show his aggression. This aggressive thrust is besides important as an evolutionary factor in human development. It is our battle for endurance, and s ubsequently domination, that has lead to our cultural and technological promotions. Aggressiveness has added to adult males familial fittingness ; through saving of the territorial balance, defence of the immature, and endurance of the fittest. Despite aggressions negative intensions it is a necessary facet of our nature and is required to further human s development. Charles Darwin supported this theory and stated that, adult male, like every other animate being, has no uncertainty advanced to his present high status through a battle for being, he besides stated that ; if he is to progress s boulder clay higher, it is to be feared that he must stay capable to a terrible battle. Clearly aggression has its positive utilizations in society, but we can non bury that it besides has had a destructive influence on our society, chiefly in inciting war. Human nature, and its look of aggression, has a considerable impact on war. It can non be overlooked as a conducive factor, although the extent to which it instigates war is controversial. Kenneth Waltz discussed the three images of war, and it is the first image that straight concerns itself with the application of human nature. Waltz maintains that war consequences from selfishness, and misdirected aggressive urges. This supports the earlier contention that aggression can be negatively directed into warring state of affairss. This theory suggests that human nature, and aggression, are a primary cause of war, although they have non blindly stated that it is the lone factor. Waltz besides illustrated nevertheless, that all other factors must be evaluated in visible radiation of understanding the impact of aggression. Niebuhr wrote simplistically that war has its beginnings in, dark, unconscious beginnings in the human nature, he appears to be lending war as an inevitable act of human nature. However, this is a terrible dictum and Niebuhr does non recognize that human nature is besides the supplier of peace. Waltz right highlighted human nature as the cause of war in 1914, but he besides pointed out that it was the cause of peace in 1910. Human nature can be manipulated by fortunes to ensue in war ; our built-in aggressive nature can unluckily ensue in an aggressive response in times of emphasis, whether that emphasis is economic, political, or societal. However, this built-in aggressiveness can non be used as an alibi for doing war ; it is a powerful conducive factor, but it can be controlled and diverted into other manifestations. Despite the obvious usage of our built-in aggression, adult females are frequently utilized as grounds back uping that aggression is a consequence of purely environmental factors. The evident inactive function of adult females in our society is proof that work forces are merely aggressive because society expects them to act in this m ode, and encourages them to make so. However, this is a comparatively limited statement. Both work forces and adult females are born with an built-in aggressiveness, but adult females have terrible cultural restrictions that restrict their look of aggression. Womans have traditionally non participated in whole graduated table war because they are perceived to be physically inferior to work forces, and this deficiency of engagement has contributed to the perceptual experience that adult females are non aggressive by nature. However, an aggressive nature has been apparent in the yesteryear ; adult females have been significantly involved historically in opposition and terrorist groups. Even noncombative adult females have displayed an aggressive nature. A quotation mark from J. Gray stated, many a combat soldier in World War Two was appalled to have letters from his girlfriend, or married woman, safe at place, demanding to cognize how many of the enemy he had personally accounted for and frequently bespeaking the decease of several more as a personal favour for her. This illustrated that although adult females may be culturally restrained in showing their aggression, it still exists and it is as inherent in their nature as it is in males. It is evident that human nature has an inherently aggressive constituent. The controversial definitions of human nature, and the influence it has on worlds behaviour, has been convincingly argued by many respected intellectuals. Ethology, sociobiology, and a scientific accent on environmental factors, all contribute to specifying human nature and the presence, or deficiency of, built-in aggression. It is clear that sociobiology provides a scientific attack to understanding the built-in aggression of persons, without leting this to be an alibi for the look of this aggression. Despite the being of this built-in demand, sociobiology allows that the environment topographic points limitations of worlds that can enable our society to map without regressing to this demand, and its look in war. Both work forces, and adult females, are capable to built-in aggression and it is an inevitable consequence of our natural, undeveloped nature. But we must besides recognize the ability of worlds to believe and act rationally, and it is this factor that will forestall built-in aggressiveness from going a unequivocal facet of human society, and provides us with an optimistic hereafter without ineluctable arrested development to warfare. 338
Sunday, March 8, 2020
Creons Dramatic Monologue from Antigone
Creons Dramatic Monologue from Antigone Considering he appears in all three plays ofà ââ¬â¹Ã¢â¬â¹Sophocles Oedipus trilogy, Creon is a complex and diverse character. Inà ââ¬â¹Oedipus the King, he serves as an advisor and moral compass. In Oedipus at Colonus, he tries to negotiate with the blind ex-monarch in hopes of gaining power. Finallyà in, Creon has attained the throne after a long civil war between two brothers,à ââ¬â¹Eteocles, and Polyneices. Oedipusââ¬â¢ son Eteocles died defending the city-state of Thebes. Polyneices, on the other hand, dies trying to usurp power from his brother. Creons Dramatic Monologue In this monologueà placed at the playââ¬â¢s beginning, Creon establishes the conflict. The fallen Etecles is granted a heroââ¬â¢s funeral. However, Creon decrees that the traitorous Polyneices will be left to rot in the wilderness. This royal order will stir up a singular rebellion when the devoted sister of the brothers, Antigone, refuses to abide by Creonââ¬â¢s laws. When Creon punishes her for following the will of the Olympian Immortals and not the rule of the king, he incurs the wrath of the gods. The following excerpt is reprinted from Greek Dramas. Ed. Bernadotte Perrin. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1904 CREON: I now possess the throne and all its powers, by nearness of kinship to the dead. No man can be fully known, in soul and spirit and mind, until he hath been seen versed in rule and law-giving. For if any, being supreme guide of the state, cleaves not to the best counsels, but, through some fear, keeps his lips locked, I hold, and have ever held, him most base; and if any makes a friend of more account than his fatherland, that man hath no place in my regard. For Ibe Zeus my witness, who sees all things alwayswould not be silent if I saw ruin, instead of safety, coming to the citizens; nor would I ever deem the countrys foe a friend to myself; remembering this, that our country is the ship that bears us safe, and that only while she prospers in our voyage can we make true friends. Such are the rules by which I guard this citys greatness. And in accord with them is the edict which I have now published to the folk touching the sons of Oedipus; that Eteocles, who hath fallen fighti ng for our city, in all renown of arms, shall be entombed, and crowned with every rite that follows the noblest dead to their rest. But for his brother, Polyneiceswho came back from exile, and sought to consume utterly with fire the city of his fathers and the shrines of his fathers godssought to taste of kindred blood, and to lead the remnant into slaverytouching this man, it hath been proclaimed to our people that none shall grace him with sepulture or lament, but leave him unburied, a corpse for birds and dogs to eat, a ghastly sight of shame.
Thursday, February 20, 2020
Argue which of the 3 sources best represent how civilian reacted in Essay - 1
Argue which of the 3 sources best represent how civilian reacted in WW2 - Essay Example While the entire Britain suffered loss and devastation, the attacks were also helpful in galvanizing the nation: there emerged a new steady determination in the face of the scary onslaught of Nazi. The Blitz is well written, original and revealing; it is a re-examination of one the vital aspects of the history of the second world war that is highly needed. The second source, The British and the Second World War, is a book written by Arthur Marwick and published in the year 1976. The reason why the book was published is to show how Britain successfully mobilized the civilian for the war. The mobilization of Britain during this period proved to get a breakthrough in winning public opinionââ¬â¢s strong support in maintaining the war. The war can be termed as a people war; it expanded the aspirations of democracy and resulted to a postwar welfare state promises. Much of success in getting peopleââ¬â¢s support is attributed to the systematic and planned women mobilization, as soldiers, housewives, and workers, put in force by conscription after the month of December in the year 1941. Women gave themselves to support the war effort, making successful the rationing of the consumer goods. Either of the two ways, compulsion and voluntarism, were used for mobilization. However, reliance on voluntarism was successful for the British. The g overnmentââ¬â¢s achievement in providing new services such as lunches for hospitals and schools, as well as the peopleââ¬â¢s war equalitarian spirit, contributed towards extensive support for an expanded welfare state (Marwick 1976). The third source is a book that was authored by Joseph Darracott in the year 1989: World War Two in cartoons. The book also unveils or reveals the response received from the civilian (the public) but in human graphics form, cartoons. It is a cartoon collection on the Second World War; the cartoons have been found in archives, in the entire globe. This
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
Managing Organisational Behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1
Managing Organisational Behaviour - Essay Example As an example, long hours of standing were seen to cause deformities in children (Spartacus Education, n.d.). Against this backdrop, many factories began to flourish and Ransomeââ¬â¢s Orwell Works was one of them. This was an agricultural machinery factory that produced products from 1841 to 1966 which gave them a rich history of manufacturing and growth. In the beginning of Ransome Orwell, several family members came together to work and finance the foundry and many of their workers were family friends or came from the nearby community. They always relied on people they knew to help them in their business rather than looking to strangers to help them. One thing to note is that the Ransomes were Quakers and had a large community to choose from. Because they were Quakers, they followed this way of life. This created a positive ability to recruit and select other people who were friends. Many of the people who worked for them stayed their entire lives. It could be assumed that Ranso mes had a better opportunity for recruitment because they knew and understood the people they were working around. One reason this could be surmised is that the Ipswich Transportation Museum states that many of their workers stayed with them from the time they entered the business to the time the individual died. The management style at Ransome Orwell would be very close to what the Quakers experience today. They would have a very religious idea of management and would consult each other before making decisions. Everything that is done during a business meeting begins with worship and continues as worship. People are very orderly and stand before they speak (Latham). Therefore, Ransome Orwell would have used prayer and worship as their way of making decisions in business and their management style would have reflected this attitude.
Monday, January 27, 2020
Teaching Conditional Sentences
Teaching Conditional Sentences The Teaching of Conditional Sentences Part 1: Evaluation of the Textbook Treatment of Conditional Sentences I. Introduction: Definition of Conditional Sentences In grammar, conditional sentences refer to the discussion of factual implications or imaginary or hypothetical situations and their results. They express something that must happen or be true if another thing is to happen or be true (Hornby, 2000; Swan, 1996). Generally, conditional sentences consist of two main clauses ââ¬â a main (ââ¬Ëconditional) clause containing a verb in a form with will or would, and a subordinate clause that is introduced by if (Parrott, 2000). The order of the two clauses can appear interchangeably. When the if-clause leads the sentence, normally a comma is used. However, when the conditional sentence takes the lead, no comma is found after it. In certain cases, the way we use this comma in conditional sentences lies ââ¬Ëpartly on their length and partly on personal preference (Parrott, 2000, p. 231). II. First Conditional A. Basic Form In the basic form of the first conditional, the verb in the if-clause takes the present tense, and the verb in the main or conditional clause takes the simple future. If Clause Conditional Clause If + present tense, Future tense Conditional Clause If Clause Future tense If + present tense B. Meaning and Use Generally, the first conditional or conditional sentence type one is used to express a probable condition and its probable result in the future (Soars Liz, 2007; Swan, 1996; Thomson Martinet, 1986). Nonetheless, it does not limit itself only to this use. Parrott (2000) points out that this type of conditional is employed to show ââ¬Ëaspects of persuasion such as cajoling and negotiation and for giving warnings and making threats'(p. 232), as can be seen in the examples below. Examples: [a] If you have enough rest, you will feel better. [b] Ill cook for you this evening if you help me with this assignment. [c] If he procrastinates, hell miss the flight. [d] Ill kill you if you dont stop your relationship with my sister. Apart from these functions, the first conditional sentence can possibly appear in certain variations. Variations can be present in both the conditional clause and the if-clause. In the conditional clause, a range of other forms, such as may, might, can, must, should or imperative or any expression of command, request or advice, may be used instead of will, depending on what messages we want to send (Parrott, 2000; Thomson Martinet, 1986). For example, if we want to show that something is possible, we can use either may or might instead of will, or when want to indicate permission, either may or can is possible. Moreover, when we want to advise or suggest someone to do something, we can use should or had better or imperative form. Examples below show these. Examples: [a] If you drive fast, you may/might hit others on the road. [b] If you dont feel well, you may/can leave early today. [c] If you want to thoroughly enjoy Christmas, you should finish your assignment well before the deadline. [c1] If you want to gain weight, you had better eat and sleep more. [c2] If dont feel well with coffee, never drink it again. Interestingly, two present tenses can also appear in both the if-clause and the conditional clause. When it is the case, it is usually used to indicate automatic or habitual results (Thomson Martinet, 1986). An example below shows this usage. It should be noted here that this kind of use can mostly be seen in the zero conditional, which mainly discusses factual situation or natural phenomena. Therefore, students at a lower level should not be presented this difference. Example: If there is a shortage of any product, prices of that product go up. Similar to the variations in the conditional clause, we can also use a range of present forms in the if-clause, depending on the meaning we want to convey (Parrott, 2000; Thomson Martinet, 1986). For example, we can use present continuous or present perfect instead of present simple to show a present action or a future arrangement. When we want to show that something is less likely possible and it may happen only by chance, we can use should because it helps weaken the possibility (Parrott, 2000). All these can be found in the examples below. Examples: [a1] If you are coming over next week, Ill bake our traditional cakes for you. [a2] If the letter hasnt arrived by the next hour, well have to phone the post office. [b] If she should call me at night, I wont answer. Moreover, we can also find the use of will or would in the if-clause when we want to indicate polite requests. However, often will is seen as less polite than would (Swan, 1996). At this point, it should also be noted that should can also be used in replacement of if, usually in more formal, written contexts (ibid, 2000), without any change of the meaning (Azar, 2002). This kind of use indicates offer or suggestion. Here are the two examples: If you will/would carry this bag, Ill treat you lunch. Should you need more help, you can call me any time. III. Second Conditional A. Basic Form In general, the basic form of Type 2 conditional uses the past tense in the if-clause, and would + bare infinitive or ââ¬Ëthe conditional tense in the conditional clause to ââ¬Ëdistance our language from reality (Swan, 1996; Thomson Martinet, 1986). If Clause Conditional Clause If + past tense, would + bare infinitive Conditional Clause If Clause would + bare infinitive If + past tense B. Meaning and Use The second conditional is used to talk about an unreal situation and its probable results now or in the future. The situation or condition is improbable, impossible, untrue, imaginary or contrary to know facts (Azar, 2002; Parrott, 2000; Soars Liz, 2007; Swan, 1996; Thomson Martinet, 1986). It is important to note that there is no time difference between Type 1 and 2 conditionals, and the past tense in the if-clause of Type 2 conditional is not a true past, but a subjunctive (Parrott, 2000; Thomson Martinet, 1986). However, while Type 1 conditional is viewed as a real possibility, Type 2 is not the case. Besides, were instead of was is more often found in the if-clause in more formal sentences, and many people consider it more correct, especially in American English (Parrott, 2000; Swan, 1996; Thomson Martinet, 1986). Examples below show these uses. Examples: [a] If I had enough saving, Id buy that grand house. [b] If I were rich, Id be happy! [c] If the plan crashed, Id be terrified. Not different from the first conditional, the second conditional likewise has its possible variations, in both the if-clause and the conditional clause. For the variation in the conditional clause, we can use, for example, might or could or the past tense in place of would to talk about several other things. This ranges from ability or permission to the past automatic or habitual actions. Below examples show this use. Examples: [a1] If she applied for that position again, she might get it. [a2] If they had tickets, they could enter the theater. [b] If he got home late, his wife slept first. In the if-clause, instead of using if with a simple past, it is possible to have if with a past continuous, indicating a wish for a difference for a temporary situation. Moreover, sometimes were + infinitive, in placement of a past tense form in the if-clause, is used to make the situation more hypothetical or polite. At other times, the inversion of the if-subject and were can be seen, and when were takes the if-subjects place, if is then left out. The meaning is still the same. Here are the examples: Examples: [a] She doesnt like the children but now they are going to her home. If they were not going there, shed be a lot fine. [b] If they were to study harder, their teacher would be much happier to help them. [b1] Were they to study harder, their teacher would be much happier to help them. IV. Third Conditional A. Basic Form The basic form of the third conditional takes the past perfect in the if-clause, and would with have plus past participle, or ââ¬Ëthe perfect conditional in the conditional clause. If Clause Conditional Clause If + past perfect, would + have + past participle Conditional Clause If Clause would + have + past participle If + past perfect B. Meaning and Use The third conditional is generally used to speculate about the past events, which are unreal or imaginary, and about the ways things might have been affected just because how other things happened or did not happen. This conditional is also used to talk about regret, criticism or excuse (Parrott, 2000; Thomson Martinet, 1986; Vince Emmerson, 2003). Examples: [a] Kate would have been nice if Peter had treated her equally. [b] If she hadnt gone out late at night, she wouldnt have been rapped. [c] If my car hadnt broken down, Id have been able to catch you up. The same as the first and second conditional, the third conditional has its possible variations, in both the if-clause and the conditional clause. In the conditional clause, in place of would, we can use, for example, might or could to discuss ability, possibility or permission. Examples: [a1] If we had found him earlier, we could have saved his life [a2] If we had found him earlier, we might have saved him. [a3] If our documents had been in order, we could have left at once. In the if-clause, had can be used in the form of inversion. When had is used, then if is to be deleted. No meaning is changed in such usage. If you had asked for his permission, he wouldnt have been that mad at you = Had you asked for his permission, he wouldnt have been that mad at you. V. ââ¬ËUnless in conditional sentences In conditional sentences we can use a wide range of conjunctions, such as supposing, as long as, provided, unless, etc., instead of if. Here, however, only unless is discussed. Unless is usually perceived as sharing similar meaning with ifâ⬠¦not (Swan, 1996; Thomson Martinet, 1986). However, as Parrott (2000) argues unless has a ââ¬Ëstrong degree of reservation compared to ifâ⬠¦not. Examples: I wont go with you unless you pick me up. Ill go with you only if you pick me up. There is an exceptional case when unless cannot be used in replacement to ifâ⬠¦not. We would rather use ifâ⬠¦not instead of unless if it refers to something negative that would be the main cause of the situation we are talking about (Swan, 1996). Instead of saying, ââ¬ËMy wife will be very upset unless I get back tomorrow, we say, ââ¬ËMy wife will be very upset if I dont get back tomorrow. This being so because the root cause of the wifes unhappiness is if the speaker does not go back. VI. Implications for teaching conditional sentences Different types of conditional sentences are taught at different levels. A general suggestion given by Parrott (2000) is that the first conditional should be introduced at an elementary or intermediate level; the second at a lower intermediate; and the third at an upper intermediate level. As for the Secondary 3, Band 2 students who are seen as pre-intermediate level, they should be introduced to all the four types of conditional. However, the introduction of details or variations of each type should be carefully considered. As can be seen from the detailed explanation of the three types above, there are many variations in each type, in both the if-clause and the conditional clause. The Secondary 3 students at this level should therefore not be taught all these variations. Otherwise, this will become a very good confusion for them. However, if there are some strong students in the class and if the teacher is ambitious, he or she can introduce his or students to some kind of the variations of the conditional clause Type 1 and 2. These variations could be the use of might or may instead of will in the first conditional, and might or could instead of would in the second conditional. The third conditional is already very difficult and the students should not be made confus ed because of these variations. It should be noted that before all these variations can be introduced, teachers should make sure that the students are made clear with the basic forms of the four types. Furthermore, the way how the conditionals are punctuated should also be ensured since for most Chinese students, recognizing the order of conditional sentences is difficult for them. This being so because the order of clauses does not go with the order in their language (Parrott, 2000). VII. Treatment of a Hong Kong textbook on conditionals The Living English 3B by Nancarrow, Thomas and Yuen (2005) used for Secondary 3 features all the four types of conditionals. Type 0, 1 and 2 are introduced mainly in terms of revision and of some forms of variations. Type 3 is presented virtually exclusively in form of basic rule and usage. However, there is no introduction of conjunctions which can be used in place of if. Perhaps this may be helpful for the students instead, for they are not overwhelmed with too many things at this level. The presentation of the use of the first conditional is simple and well enough for the students to understand. Nevertheless, there seems a bit vague for weaker students to fully recognize the changing of the order of the clauses, explained in the note on page 43. The students should be drawn to the fact that there is no change in meaning even if the position of the two clauses is changed. Another thing is that there is an explanation of variation of this conditional in the Teachers Book (TB), which requires teachers to tell their students but which is generally not necessary at this level. There are two problems in the explanation of the first conditional. The first one is with its description of usage. The explanation tells that this type of conditional is used to describe ââ¬Ëthe future consequences of a situation that is true now (Nancarrow, et al., 2005, p. 43). The wording here looks easy but it may not be the case for the students to grasp the whole picture, and thus needs revision. The second problem concerns with the variation of this type. The book explains that it is possible to use can or may instead of will. However, in the Students Book (SB), it does not give any example of this possibility, nor does it indicate what it means when they are used. A short explanation is available only in TB, though. For the second conditional, it carries only the last problem of the first conditional. In other words, SB gives the same explanation that variation is possible for the second conditional, but fails to show the usage and meaning. Again, only TB explains this va riation in more details. The presentation of the third conditional in this book is very well structured. It introduces the students to the most basic use of this conditional through clear explanation and examples. It suits the students level quite well. One last note is that the textbook should not introduce the variations of the first three types of conditional. Ironically, the title is devoted only to revising, yet the students are also presented with variations. At this level, the students should learn mainly the basic or general forms and usage. Variations should be presented in the next levels. However, one good thing is that there is no presentation of conjunctions, which can be used to replace if. It is good to make sure that the students can understand the basic first. Part Two: Critique and Reflection I. Critique on Ms Leungs teaching Ms Leung is revising conditional sentences Type 1 and 2 and trying to introduce Type 3 and conjunction unless to her Secondary 3 students. Certain problems appear as she handles these grammatical aspects in each excerpt. Among all problems, her inadequacy of knowledge of the underlying system of language is the central one and in turn affects the ways she handles her teaching. In excerpt 1, in which she revises the first and second conditionals, Ms Leung generally appears unclear herself in what she explains to her students. She asks her students to remember that with Type 1 conditional, it has to be future in the main clause. She yet does not point out specifically what kind of future tense it is to which she is referring since there are many future tenses. Although this is apparently clear that she is referring to the simple future will, being a well-language aware teacher, she should present it to the students to clear confusion it may have. Concerning her explanation of the use of this conditional, I feel the word choice is rather ambiguous. She tells her students that conditional Type 1 is for a prediction. Even though the form of will here is used as the normal future form in general, there is a significant difference between the use of will in conditional sentences and in general sentences. In a general sentence, will is used ââ¬Ëfor unplanned fu ture events, or to make predictions that arent based on present or past evidence (Parrott, 2000, p. 170). However, in a Type 1 conditional sentence, the use of will in the main or conditional clause is to indicate a probable result, not a prediction of it. This can be implied that the teacher is not truly well aware of the content subject. When Ms Leung revises the second conditional in the same excerpt, she seems to create similar problems as when she handles the first conditional. The first problem concerns with the relationship between her own explanation of the use of the second conditional and her examples. She gives two examples to her students and informs the students that the second conditional is used to talk about ââ¬Ëthings which are not so probable, they are possible but not very probable. To some degree, the examples do carry an improbable meaning. However, the two are just contrary to known fact, with the first example indicates an imaginary future situation, and the second an imaginary present situation. The second example also indicates clearly that it is advice, which the teacher misses to convey to her students. The second problem is the extent of her explanation, in addition to the first problem. She does not make it clear to her students whether the past tense used in the if-clause refers to the real past, or present or future speculation. Some students may be still doubtful about this tense, though they have already gone through it. This implies that the teacher is not well aware of the students difficulties or that she is not thinking about the language content from the viewpoint of the learners (Andrews, 2007). In excerpt 2, she introduces the third conditional, and here two critical problems come about. The first one is about overgeneralization of the conditional form in both the if-clause and the main clause. Ms Leung presents to her students that all the third conditionals begin with if plus Past Perfect. To say that all the third conditionals start with if is already too exaggerated. She seems not to take into consideration the variation of this form. It is questionable in her explanation whether it is still called Type 3 conditional when ââ¬Ëhad is used instead of if in the case of inversion. As she goes on to explain the form in the main clause, Ms Leung makes the same overgeneralized mistake. She mentions that would have done is always used in the main clause. This rule again ignores the fact that there are variations in the third conditional too. In addition, it creates confusion in the use of ââ¬Ëhave done. As can be seen from her example, ââ¬Ëdone is not used with ââ¬Ëhave. Instead, it is ââ¬Ëwoken that is being used with ââ¬Ëhave. The example and the rule then do not match, and so another question arrives whether this is a conditional sentence or not. The second problem in her presentation of this Type 3 conditional is the fact that there is no explanation of when it is used at all. She presents to her students only the form and a single example. Why or when the third conditional is used is not explained. Although the students may know how to structure this conditional, they surely do not know when to use it. This seems like it is nothing for the students to learn because how useful it is to use this conditional they are not aware of. One last note is that the teacher seems not willing to give more examples to help with her explanation. This insufficient example would mean to limit the general understanding of the students, and so they will not learn. Ms Leung finally finishes her class by trying to introduce another language point. She teaches her students how to use unless in place of ifâ⬠¦not. Even though she can manage to tell her students relatively well that unless can be used instead of ifâ⬠¦not when the if-clause is negative, she perhaps may not be well aware that meaning of the two sentences is not exactly the same as she has claimed. According to Parrott (2000) unless carters a stronger degree of reservation compared to ifâ⬠¦not. This shows that the teachers knowledge of the subject-matter is insufficient enough. Besides, Ms Leung is unable to clarify when to use unless instead of ifâ⬠¦not. From the beginning of this introduction, she tries to tell her students that they can use unless sometimes. Nonetheless, she ends up not explaining when exactly, and so abruptly changes the way she presents to the students. This perhaps indicates also that she lacks ââ¬Ëstrategic competence (Bachman, 1990). Through her teaching of all the language points, it is obviously clear that Ms Leung does not check with her students whether or not they have understood what has been taught. Instead, she seems to rush from one language point to another very quickly. This seems that she does not care about the students learning or that she wants to escape from the students questions. An implication from this behavior and her so far inability to clarify each language point is that she is short of necessary subject-matter knowledge as well as language competency. These inadequacies will in turn impact the way the teacher handles the teaching in a negative way. According to Andrews (2007), professional factors of teacher affect the teachers attitudes in a way that the teacher is afraid of giving serious attention to language-related issues. Because of this, the learners cannot get a meaningful learning from the teacher. II. Reflection of what can be done differently better If I were Ms Leung, I would adopt a different approach to teaching this language point to the students in this target group. As can be seen from her teaching, she is trying both to revise two conditional types and to introduce two other major language points at the same time. This teaching is already too much with the time available and the target group, and therefore can be unfruitful. ââ¬ËAt different levels of language learning students will need to be shown different aspects of grammar and teachers will need to decide how detailed their approach to grammar will be (Joyce Burns, 1999, p. 66). If I were the teacher myself, I would not introduce conjunction unless to the students. At this level, the students should be taught only the basic form or marked feature, that is, ifâ⬠¦not first. The unmarked feature such as unless should be left for the students to learn by themselves naturally before the right time comes (Ellis, 2006). I would therefore use the available time for teaching this conjunction to focus more on the revising of Type 1 and 2 conditionals and on the elaboration of Type 3, for I believe this intensive teaching will help them progress through the sequence of stages involved in the acquisition of that structure (ibid, 2006). For the explanation of Type 1, I would simplify the wording that the teacher uses to discuss when this conditional is used. Instead of telling the students that this conditional is used for predictions, I would say it is used to show a possible condition and its probable result in the future. In the same way for Type 2, I would tell t he students that it is used to talk about an unreal situation and its probable results now or in the future, or to give advice to someone. I would also draw their attention to the fact that the past tense used in the if-clause is not the real past, but a subjunctive which indicates unreality or improbability. In addition, I would give the examples that truly reflect its usage, so that the examples can help facilitate the students understanding in a better way. For Type 3 conditional, I would first change the extreme generalization the teacher makes in both clauses. I would tell the students that in the if-clause, we usually use the Past Perfect, and would plus Past Participle in the main clause. Then I would give them 3 examples. From this, I would present to them when we use this third conditional. The students will find it easier to understand the central meaning with the facilitation of the examples on the board. If I had some time left, I would establish connections between form and meaning for them to practice the language point since this is a fundamental aspect of language acquisition (VanPatten, Williams, Rott, 2004, as cited in Ellis, 2006).
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Alzheimers Disease :: Alzheimers Disease Essays
Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is a slowly progressive, degenerative disorder of the brain that eventually results in abnormal brain function and death. The disease was first described in 1907 by a German physician, Dr. Alois Alzheimer(1864-1915). In the neurological autopsy on the brain of a 56-year-old woman Auguste D., of Frankfurt, who died after several years of progressive mental deterioration marked by increasing confusion and memory loss. Taking advantage of a then-new staining technique, he noticed an odd disorganization of the nerve cells in her cerebral cortex, the part of the brain responsible for reasoning and memory. The cells were bunched up like a rope tied in knots. He termed the strange nerve bundles neurofibrillary tangles. He also noted an unexpected accumulation of cellular debris around the affected nerves, which he termed senile plaques. In a medical journal article published in 1905, Alzheimer speculated that the nerve tangles and plaques were responsible for the womenââ¬â¢s dementia. Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is a disorder marked by a gradual decline in brain function that gets worse with time. It used to be assumed that this change was a normal part of aging that we called senility. Some people develop this condition when they are as young as 40 years of age. However, the disease is most common in persons over the age of 65. It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of persons over 65 years of age may have Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease and that in persons over the age of 85, up to 50 percent may be affected. Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is not a normal part of the aging process. It is not contagious, and it is not known how it can be prevented. While the physical changes in the brain are very similar among different people the behavioral and psychological symptoms that result are complex and may differ from person to person(Kawas, 80). These symptoms lead to a form of dementia which is the loss of mental skills and abilities, including self-care capabilities. As Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease progresses, these losses will result in total dependency for even the simplest activities(Erickson, 149). à à à à à Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease usually comprises of three stages. The first being the onset stage. The symptoms of the onset stage often appear very gradually. There may be some minimum memory loss, particularly of recent events. The individual may experience difficulty in finding the right words to use during casual conversations. Work performance may begin to deteriorate and changes in behavior may start to become obvious. Alzheimer's Disease :: Alzheimer's Disease Essays Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is a slowly progressive, degenerative disorder of the brain that eventually results in abnormal brain function and death. The disease was first described in 1907 by a German physician, Dr. Alois Alzheimer(1864-1915). In the neurological autopsy on the brain of a 56-year-old woman Auguste D., of Frankfurt, who died after several years of progressive mental deterioration marked by increasing confusion and memory loss. Taking advantage of a then-new staining technique, he noticed an odd disorganization of the nerve cells in her cerebral cortex, the part of the brain responsible for reasoning and memory. The cells were bunched up like a rope tied in knots. He termed the strange nerve bundles neurofibrillary tangles. He also noted an unexpected accumulation of cellular debris around the affected nerves, which he termed senile plaques. In a medical journal article published in 1905, Alzheimer speculated that the nerve tangles and plaques were responsible for the womenââ¬â¢s dementia. Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is a disorder marked by a gradual decline in brain function that gets worse with time. It used to be assumed that this change was a normal part of aging that we called senility. Some people develop this condition when they are as young as 40 years of age. However, the disease is most common in persons over the age of 65. It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of persons over 65 years of age may have Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease and that in persons over the age of 85, up to 50 percent may be affected. Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease is not a normal part of the aging process. It is not contagious, and it is not known how it can be prevented. While the physical changes in the brain are very similar among different people the behavioral and psychological symptoms that result are complex and may differ from person to person(Kawas, 80). These symptoms lead to a form of dementia which is the loss of mental skills and abilities, including self-care capabilities. As Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease progresses, these losses will result in total dependency for even the simplest activities(Erickson, 149). à à à à à Alzheimerââ¬â¢s disease usually comprises of three stages. The first being the onset stage. The symptoms of the onset stage often appear very gradually. There may be some minimum memory loss, particularly of recent events. The individual may experience difficulty in finding the right words to use during casual conversations. Work performance may begin to deteriorate and changes in behavior may start to become obvious.
Saturday, January 11, 2020
The Kite Runner Chapter Review (Narrative Aspects) Chapter 1
The Kite Runner Chapter Review of Narrative Aspects Chapter 1; It is December 2001, and our narrator, recalls an event that occurred in 1975, when he was twelve years old and growing up in Afghanistan. He doesnââ¬â¢t say what happened, but says it made him who he is. He follows this recollection by telling us about a call he received last summer from a friend in Pakistan, Rahim Khan. Rahim Khan asks Amir, to come to Pakistan to see him. When Amir gets off the phone, he takes a walk through San Francisco, where he lives now.He notices kites flying, and thinks of his past, including his friend Hassan. Narrative aspects: Narrative voice: 1st person narrative, ââ¬ËI became what I am todayââ¬â¢ ââ¬â Amir tells us a story about his past, and what he remembers, from his point of view. Indirect speech, ââ¬ËI thought about something Rahim Khan saidâ⬠¦. There is a way to be good again. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â it doesnââ¬â¢t let the reader make a relationship with the other cha racter, as this chapter is all about Amir.Setting: Introduces the alley almost straight away, ââ¬ËI have been peeking into that deserted alley for the last twenty-six yearsââ¬â¢ ââ¬â it gives us a mysterious setting, and the alley becomes a key symbol of misdeeds in the novel. Talks about where he is while telling the story, ââ¬Ëlike a pair of eyes looking down on San Francisco. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â gives us a brief idea of where he is and wants us to find out why he is there, as it also talks about Afghanistan and Pakistan.Structure: the repetition of kites, ââ¬Ësaw a pair of kites, red with long blue tails, soaring in the sky. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬Ëtwin kites. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â significant because it sticks in a readerââ¬â¢s brain as they try to work out how the kites may be significant in the rest of the novel. Which they find out they are. Also ââ¬Ëtwin kitesââ¬â¢ can refer to Hassan and Amir, as they are brothers and the last kite they ran together made their fr iendship fall apart. Non- linear, it talks about different points of his life in a very short amount of time, because he is ooking back on his life as well as telling the reader what is happening in his life while he is telling the story. Form: Monologue, speaks in broken language, almost like in his thoughts he canââ¬â¢t put in words what he is thinking and what he remembers, ââ¬ËI looked up at those twin kites. I thought about Hassan. Thought about Baba. Ali. Kabul. ââ¬â¢- it gives the reader an impression that there is a lot to find out about Amir. Retrospective Narrative, he is looking back on his past, and the opening chapter makes us curious about what will happen next. The Kite Runner Chapter Review (Narrative Aspects) Chapter 1 The Kite Runner Chapter Review of Narrative Aspects Chapter 1; It is December 2001, and our narrator, recalls an event that occurred in 1975, when he was twelve years old and growing up in Afghanistan. He doesnââ¬â¢t say what happened, but says it made him who he is. He follows this recollection by telling us about a call he received last summer from a friend in Pakistan, Rahim Khan. Rahim Khan asks Amir, to come to Pakistan to see him. When Amir gets off the phone, he takes a walk through San Francisco, where he lives now.He notices kites flying, and thinks of his past, including his friend Hassan. Narrative aspects: Narrative voice: 1st person narrative, ââ¬ËI became what I am todayââ¬â¢ ââ¬â Amir tells us a story about his past, and what he remembers, from his point of view. Indirect speech, ââ¬ËI thought about something Rahim Khan saidâ⬠¦. There is a way to be good again. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â it doesnââ¬â¢t let the reader make a relationship with the other cha racter, as this chapter is all about Amir.Setting: Introduces the alley almost straight away, ââ¬ËI have been peeking into that deserted alley for the last twenty-six yearsââ¬â¢ ââ¬â it gives us a mysterious setting, and the alley becomes a key symbol of misdeeds in the novel. Talks about where he is while telling the story, ââ¬Ëlike a pair of eyes looking down on San Francisco. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â gives us a brief idea of where he is and wants us to find out why he is there, as it also talks about Afghanistan and Pakistan.Structure: the repetition of kites, ââ¬Ësaw a pair of kites, red with long blue tails, soaring in the sky. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬Ëtwin kites. ââ¬â¢ ââ¬â significant because it sticks in a readerââ¬â¢s brain as they try to work out how the kites may be significant in the rest of the novel. Which they find out they are. Also ââ¬Ëtwin kitesââ¬â¢ can refer to Hassan and Amir, as they are brothers and the last kite they ran together made their fr iendship fall apart. Non- linear, it talks about different points of his life in a very short amount of time, because he is ooking back on his life as well as telling the reader what is happening in his life while he is telling the story. Form: Monologue, speaks in broken language, almost like in his thoughts he canââ¬â¢t put in words what he is thinking and what he remembers, ââ¬ËI looked up at those twin kites. I thought about Hassan. Thought about Baba. Ali. Kabul. ââ¬â¢- it gives the reader an impression that there is a lot to find out about Amir. Retrospective Narrative, he is looking back on his past, and the opening chapter makes us curious about what will happen next.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)